“Many early instances, understandably protecting of a nascent business, learn part 230’s protections expansively. However, given the maturing web financial system and emergence of dominant social media platforms, the FCC ought to re-examine part 230, in addition to different provisions of the Communications Act of 1934. The FCC ought to decide how part 230 can finest serve its targets of selling web variety and a free move of concepts, in addition to holding dominant platforms accountable for his or her editorial selections, in new market situations and applied sciences which have emerged because the 1990s.”
In a press release posted on Twitter, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr supported the petition. “[It] supplies a possibility to carry much-needed readability to the statutory textual content,” he wrote. His fellow commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, nonetheless, stated the FCC shouldn’t take the bait.
She stated in a press release:
“Whereas social media may be irritating, turning the FCC into the President’s speech police is just not the reply. The FCC must reject this effort to deploy the federal authorities towards free expression on-line… In america we’re a democratic, open society by which individuals can maintain their authorities accountable, even when imperfectly. Whether or not we will hold it that means depends upon the survival of a strong, unbiased digital house for activism and public discourse. These areas solely thrive if we are saying no to the President’s invitation to make our networks much less open and extra closed to civic debate.”